The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years Reporting in Washington
New York Times Bestseller
A landmark achievement
The Prince of Darkness is not simply the stunningly candid memoir of one of the country?s most influential reporters but also a riveting history of the past half century in American politics.
The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years Reporting in Washington Accessories
 My Grandfather's Son: A Memoir
The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
Cheney: The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President
The Reagan Diaries
Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA
Power to the People
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning
Outrage: How Illegal Immigration, the United Nations, Congressional Ripoffs, Student Loan Overcharges, Tobacco Companies, Trade Protection, and Drug Companies Are Ripping Us Off . . . and
Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations
The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years Reporting in Washington Reviews
For a political junkie it is an absolute must read. The behind the scenes look at politics and reporting was fascinating. If I had read this book as a freshman in college or as a high school senior it would have changed the course of my life; I would have become a reporter. This was a wonderful book. Mr. Novak writes about his incredible career as a Washington reporter and balances this part of the book with stories about his own life including his relationships, drinking and religion. The tidbits of history and inside look at the systems of power make this book irresistible. Really, a highly recommended book.
But I like to believe that was just Novak being Novak. Very inspiring stuff. I believe that it is precisely this audaciousness that has kept Novak at the top of his profession for these many years. As I recall the news story, he hit the bike rider so hard that the biker was sprawled against his windshield and slid off. Although this book was written before he hit the bike rider in DC and drove off, Novak still manages to hold the reader's interest.
The Valerie Plame thing is another one.when James Carville made a comment to him about his role in all of that, Novak simply disonnected his microphone and walked off the set mumbling that he doesn't have to put up with this sh*&. That's another factor in his being at the top of his profession - that superhuman ability to achieve any semblance of enunciation through the gallons of slobber in that bulldog mouth. It's a brilliant book by a brilliant slobbering man with a highly unpleasant and creepy demeanor who hit a guy with a car real hard and drove off and claimed he didn't know what happened. Oh yeah, and the trademark slobbering that skyrocketed him to fame and fortune on CNN. Novak drove off and then claimed that he was not aware of what had happened.
Some medical professionals have speculated that his brain tumor may have had something to do with the accident. Simply brilliant.
also long and includes members of both (all) parties. He tells us his predictions of House and. that, and less than that. The index seems pretty complete, but I'm just judging. date. There is some. Novak covered national politics for over 50.
get some help. reported here, but it is less than a complete history of most of the. personal failures and professional mistakes. that hated him is long. I have to remind myself a few times each year to read a political book,. This is a controversial book. other controversial works, it pays to look at other reviews by the. over his analysis.
The quotes from the columns or broadcasts are identified by. business of news and commentary in print and broadcast media, and. book and learn something from it. There is a lot of information about the. I'm impressed by his accuracy.
lying, at least according to Novak. Since you are reading these reviews you. Novak worked for several newspapers, chains, syndicates, magazines,. strong language. elections.
are probably trying to decide if you should read the book. stations, and networks. Rather, it is just enough to provide context for. spent. It is not just for political junkies.
because I should pay more attention to the field. I think readers from anywhere on the political spectrum can enjoy this. events mentioned. years, so most of the book is about politics and politicians. As with. Readers interested in particular historical events or particular people.
Novak is known as a conservative columnist, but the list of Republicans. one more attempt to justify one's actions and one more attempt to. destroy or at least discredit one's enemies. about competition and cooperation in journalism.
reviewers with strong opinions, especially those expressed in. by size. This one was time well. Senate gains and losses and Electoral College totals for various.
In spite of his inclination to the right, Novak seems much more an. There is a lot of history. This book is more than. The list of those that Novak did not respect is. In some ways "The Prince of Darkness" is a typical political memoir,. There is more than the usual amount of admission of error, both.
Novak's bragging about a scoop or complaining about someone's anger. animosity over polices, but most often the cause of the friction was. analyst than a cheerleader.
Novak was completing the journey that he had told me he was on even back then (he has since been baptized into the Catholic Church). This book is his autobiography. I know this isn't much of a review of the book. And while it seems that he has pulled no punches, neither has he been malicious or unfair.
Novak was and still is, on this day that he announced his retirement the consummate journalist, the kind of reporter that I would have wanted to model my work on, had my life taken that turn. And you can be damn sure it hasn't been ghostwritten. Novak, back in the 1980s when Ronald Reagan was president and DC was an exciting town.
I have since returned to my liberal roots, and left the church (I am now an atheist) just as Mr. Novak then. Mr. I admired Mr. No matter.
Then, I was a conservative and a Catholic. I admire him now. He is one of the most dedicated professionals I have ever met. It is, instead, a homage to the man himself, a very good and decent reporter and a great American. Let's begin with total disclosure: I once worked for Mr.
This book offers the reader valuable behind the scene insights for virtually everything of significance that has happened politically during the last half century. I was looking forward to this read with considerable anticipation. I was not disappointed. I have followed the authors columns and watched many of his tv appearances from when he was a liberal-moderate back in the Rockefeller days and have happily observed his transformation over the years to a no holds bar conservative. A must read.
|
